Publication Abstract

not signed in
Log In
Title Microseismic monitoring of a re-stimulation treatment to a Permian basin San Andres dolomite horizontal well.

Authors Quirein.J.A, Kessler, C., Trela, J.M., Zannoni, S., Cornish, B. Brewer, R.J., Gordy. D., Pettitt, W.S., Walker, C.B., Laney, J. and Young, R.P

Publication Reference SPE Annual Technical Exhibition, Anaheim, California,U.S.A. 11-14 November 2007

Abstract The results of a microseismic monitoring of a multi-stage refracturing treatment of a Permian Basin San Andres dolomite interval in an open-hole horizontal well will be presented in this paper. The treatment well has a horizontal well trajectory of approximately 3,000 feet within the reservoir section and had been extensively acid fractured during earlier production enhancement operations. The microseismic mapping objectives of the re-fracturing treatment for each of the stages were to characterize the azimuthal orientation of the fractures, the length of each wing, fracture height, and overall stimulation effectiveness. The study discusses mapping microseismic events in a challenging re-fracturing environment. The microseismic activities generated during a refracturing treatment may be very low in acoustic energy and detection may be problematic, compared to the acoustic energy released during initial hydraulic fracture propagation. In this study, few microseismic events were detected, and this data indicates that the previously propagated fractures created preferential paths for fluid flow thus reducing the propagation of a new fracture network. In fact, for the stage located the furthest from the monitor well, no microseismic events were detected. This was consistent with an Instrument Magnitude Analysis performed on the located microseismic events from the other stages that showed events further than 1,400 feet away from the monitor well were not detectable. A chemical packer was used for zonal isolation, and ball- activated sliding sleeves were used for selective injectivity for each stage along the horizontal well in the re-fracturing treatment. The operation of the sliding sleeves, for each stage and the ball drops, generated compressional and shear events which were detected by the geophone array in the monitor well. This confirmed that the instrumentation was able to detect events between the treatment well and monitor well in this job and that the microsesimic events induced during the re-stimulation treatment were at a much lower energy. The low-energy events that were located confirmed the ballactivated sleeve worked correctly and the induced fractures stayed in zone. However, the source locations detected did not delineate clear linear propagation of hydrofractures from the wellbore but described a complex fracture network.

Key Figure

Link http://www.spe.org/atce/2007/tech_prog/documents/spe1103331.pdf



Return to publications list

< Return to the home page   ::  Contact Us
Applied Seismology Consultants