About ASC
Home
News
Downloads
Quality
Contact Us
Site Map
Services
Overview
Petroleum
Geothermal
Mining
Rad Waste
CO2 Storage
Engineering
Lab Testing
Software
InSite Software
InSite Modules
Licensing and Support
Custom Solutions
Demo Download
Hardware
Monitoring
Systems
OMNIBUS Range
Sensors
Data Acquisition
Research
Publications
Example Studies
External Links
Client Area
News
Releases
Manuals
Licenses
Support
InSite FAQ
Change Password
News
InSite v2.15a
ASC is pleased to announce the release of version 2.15a of InSite seis...
ASC at ARMA Symposium 2010
ASC at Second European Geothermal Review
Employment Opportunities
Workshop on Monitoring Technologies
ISO 9001:2008
Publication Abstract
not signed in
Log In
Title
Velocity Calibration for Microseismic Monitoring: Applying Smooth Layered Models With and Without Perforation Timing Measurements
Authors
Pei,D.; Quirein, J.A.; Cornish, B.E.; Ay, E.; Zannonni, S.; Kessler, C.; Pettitt, W.S.
Publication Reference
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver, Colorado, USA, 21–24 September 2008
Abstract
Theorectically, the perforation shot origin time T0 affects the accuracy of the inverted velocity structure, and therefore the accuracy of subsequent microseismic event locations. The origin time can be obtained from perforation timing measurements or estimated from the picked arrival times. In order to investigate the role of origin time in velocity calibration, we designed two inversion procedures. In procedure A, T0 is calculated during the Occam’s inversion while T0 is set to its true value in procedure B. A grid search locator is applied on both inverted models to produce two locations. We constructed three synthetic P-wave velocity models and add normally distributed random noise to the synthetic arrival times of all models. The noisy synthetic data are piped through procedure A to obtain location A and through procedure B to produce location B. Graphical analysis show that location A is closer to the true shot location than location B although both are close to each other. If we remove the data noise and repeat the test, location B is closer to the true shot than location A. It was observed that the inverted location A is better in terms of the distance from the true location if using noisy data and location B is better if using noise-free data. This indicates that uncertainties due to data noise cause our inconsistent observation and implies that perforation timing measurements are not necessary and may actually result in a less accurate velocity model.
Key Figure
Link
http://www.spe.org/atce/2008/technical/schedule/documents/spe115722.pdf
Return to publications list
<
Return to the home page
::
Contact Us
Applied Seismology Consultants
An Itasca International Company